ALLEVYN-LIFE-HERO-1-840x840-PX.png

Product features

Indications

Customer information

*Compared to standard care.

**n=37; dressing retention is 1.92x longer.

***Compared to MepilexTM Border. As demonstrated in laboratory testing; p<0.001.

****p=0.001.

*****Compared to previous dressings. Ambispective (retrospective and prospective) observational study. 1.66 ALLEVYN LIFE Dressings vs 3.14 previous dressings (including foams and gelling fibres); n=94; p<0.001). €11.45 ALLEVYN LIFE Dressings vs €27.70 previous dressings (including foams and gelling fibres); n=94; p<0.001.

Citations
  1. Milne J, et al. J Wound Care. 2020;29(5):282-288.
  2. Lindholm C, et al. Int Wound J. 2016;13 Suppl 2:5-15.
  3. Stankiewicz M, et al. WP&R Journal. 2019;27(1):21 – 26
  4. Joy H, et al. J Wound Care. 2015 Jul;24(7):312, 314-7.
  5. Rossington A, et al. Wounds UK. 2013;9(4):91-95.
  6. Stephen-Haynes JB, et al. Journal of Community Nursing. 2013;27(5):50-59.
  7. Tiscar-Gonzalez V, et al. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34(1):23–30.
  8. Forni C, et al. Int Wound J. 2018; 15(3):383-390.
  9. Forni C, et al. J Wound Care. 2020;29(2):120 - 127.
  10. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal report. DS/18/351/R.
  11. Smith+Nephew 2016. Internal report. DS/15/025/R.
  12. Smith+Nephew 2016. Internal report. DS/14/303/R.
  13. Smith+Nephew 2016. Internal report. CE/047/ALF.
  14. Simon D, et al. Wounds UK. 2014;10(3):80-87.
  15. Smith+Nephew 201. Internal report. DS/16/061/R.
  16. Austin M. Paper presented at: SAWC; 2019.
  17. Krönert GT, et al. EWMA Journal. 2016;16(2):7-12.

Title

Text