When a quarter of full-thickness rotator cuff repairs result in re-tear,*1 augment repairs with the REGENETEN◊ Bioinductive Implant to return patients to the activities they love and help more repairs stay repaired.*1
Harness the power to redefine biological healing with a highly purified collagen2 implant that induces tendon-like tissue growth,3-6 shown to have a transformational impact on repair success,*1 patient satisfaction5,7,8 and the risk of re-tear.*1
As rotator cuff repair approaches evolve, the best way to measure the success of advanced technologies will always be the evidence. Across a series of outcome measures, the REGENETEN Implant is backed by over a decade of clinical data.
Featuring a unique open architecture design, HEALICOIL◊ Suture Anchors support the body’s natural healing response.10,11
HEALICOIL◊ REGENESORB◊ Anchors are placed on the medial row, secured in a lateral row of HEALICOIL KNOTLESS Anchors.
Our advanced biocomposite REGENESORB Material is absorbed and effectively replaced by bone within 24 months.12-14
Use the REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant to induce the formation of new tendon-like tissue over the bursal surface of the rotator cuff.3-6
By supporting the body's healing response,3-6 the REGENETEN Implant is ultimately replaced by 2mm**15 of new tendon-like tissue within 6 months.***5,6
The bioinductive implant creates an environment conducive to healing;3,4,6 shown to reduce the incidence of re-tear and improve repair integrity when compared to standard repairs alone.*1
Dr. Shea's story
Following a complex full-thickness tear, Dr Owen Shea attributes his recovery to the REGENETEN Implant. Hear about a 100% recovery at 2 years, with his life back to normal and "years left in his shoulder".
Francois' Story
Rotator cuff injury can strike at any time, as it did for Francois Gaulin. Thanks to REGENETEN Implant, his repaired shoulder is identical to his uninjured shoulder...to the point he "really can't tell the difference".
*n=122. Compared to standard repairs alone in full-thickness tear repair. Re-tear rate - 8.3% vs 25.8% RR=0.32; [95% CI: 0.13-0.83]; p=0.0106. Tendon integrity - Difference in
Sugaya grade between groups, p=0.030.
**n=9.
***As demonstrated in vivo.
The patient testimonial(s) depicted represent the individual patient’s own opinions, findings, beliefs, and/or experiences. Individual results will vary. Not everyone who receives a product or treatment will experience the same or similar results; results may vary depending on a number of factors, including each patient’s specific circumstances and condition, and compliance with the applicable Instructions for Use. Smith+Nephew is not responsible for the selection of any treatment by a healthcare professional to be used on a particular patient. Smith+Nephew makes no representations, warranties, guarantees or assurances as to the availability, accuracy, currency or completeness of the information presented or its contents.
1. Ruiz Ibán MÁ et al. Arthroscopy. 2023 Dec 28:S0749-8063(23)01018-6. Epub ahead of print
2. Smith+Nephew 2020. Internal Report. 15009769.
3. Bokor DJ, et al. Muscles, Ligaments Tendons J 2016;6(1):16-25.
4. Arnoczky SP, et al. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):278-283.
5. Schlegel TF, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 27(2):242-251.
6. Van Kampen C, et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(3):229-235.
7. Schlegel TF, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30(8):1938-1948.
8. Bushnell BD, et al. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022;31(12):2532-2541.
9. Smith+Nephew 2024. Internal data.
10. Chahla J, et al. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(4):952-961.
11. Clark TR, et al. Ann Sports Med Res. 2016;3:1068.
12. Vonhoegen J, et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;14(1):12.
13. Smith + Nephew 2010. Internal Report WRP-TE045-700-08.
14. Smith + Nephew 2016. Internal Report. NCS248.
15. Bokor DJ, et al. Muscles, Ligaments Tendons J 2015;5(3):144-150.
Text